Skip to content

Turbobulls

Back to all articles
Portfolio

Time in the Market vs Timing the Market

Market timing needs two correct calls, not one. The best-days argument stated honestly, and how to measure what your own exits actually cost you.
Time in the Market vs Timing the Market
Getting out is one decision. Getting back in is a second one, and it is the half that quietly costs people the most.
Market timing is usually discussed as though it were one call. It is two, and the second is much harder than the first, because it has to be made while the reasons you sold are still in the news. This article is about staying invested versus stepping out; if your question is how to deploy cash you already hold, that is dollar-cost averaging versus lump sum instead.
Built for every reader. One worked example in euros, and a section at the end on measuring your own timing record rather than arguing about the general case.

Timing Requires Two Correct Calls

To profit from stepping out of the market you have to be right twice: sell before a fall, and buy back before the recovery.

Selling is the easy half, and not because it is well timed. It is easy because the emotional pressure to do it peaks exactly when prices are falling, so plenty of people manage the exit. The re-entry is the hard half. Nothing tells you the bottom has passed. The news is still bad. The reasons you sold are still true, often for months after the market has started climbing.

The common outcome is not a disaster; it is a slow one. You exit near the bottom, wait for confidence to return, and buy back at a level above where you sold.

The Best-Days Argument, Stated Honestly

The standard argument against timing is the "best days" statistic: miss the market's handful of strongest days and your long-run return falls sharply. MSCI, summarising analysis by Hartford Funds, puts it plainly: most returns come from a few days of outsized gains, and missing the best ten could halve an investor's return (MSCI).

That is a real finding and it is usually deployed dishonestly, so here is the other half.

Missing the worst days would help you just as much. An investor who dodged the ten largest falls would be far ahead, by roughly the same logic. Presenting only the first version is a scare tactic that hides a symmetric fact.

The honest argument is not "you will miss the best days." It is this:

The best days and the worst days occur in the same conditions. Large moves in both directions cluster in periods of market stress, because that is what volatility means. You cannot design a strategy that sidesteps the worst days without accepting a serious risk of sitting out the best ones, since they arrive in the same weeks, sometimes consecutively.

That is a structural point rather than a statistic, and it survives scrutiny in a way the one-sided version does not. Timing is not hard because good days are magic. It is hard because the good and bad days are interleaved and only distinguishable afterwards.

A Worked Example

Two investors each hold EUR 50,000. The market falls 20%, then recovers to 10% above where it started.

Investor A stays invested.

50,000 x 1.10 = EUR 55,000  (+10.0%)

Investor B exits after the fall and re-enters once the market has climbed 15% off the bottom, which is roughly what it takes for most people to feel safe.

Value at the bottom:   50,000 x 0.80 = EUR 40,000 (moved to cash)
Re-entry level:        80 x 1.15 = 92 (index terms, from a 100 start)
Remaining recovery:    110 / 92 = 1.1957
Final value:           40,000 x 1.1957 = EUR 47,826  (-4.3%)

Investor B is EUR 7,174 behind, and turned a 10% gain into a 4.3% loss. Note what B did not do wrong: they did not panic at the very bottom, and they did get back in during the recovery rather than staying in cash for years. This is the moderate, sensible version of timing, and it still cost them 14 percentage points.

What "Stay Invested" Does Not Mean

The slogan gets overextended, so it is worth bounding.

It does not mean never sell. Selling because you need the money, because you are rebalancing, because your circumstances changed, or because you have concluded the holding was a mistake are all ordinary decisions.

It does not mean ignore risk. If your allocation is wrong for you, fixing it is not market timing, and doing it during a calm period is far better than discovering it during a fall.

What it means is narrower: do not make buy and sell decisions in response to price movements or forecasts. The distinction is the trigger. A decision caused by your own circumstances is planning. The same decision caused by a market drop is timing.

Measuring Your Own Timing Record

Most articles argue this in the abstract, using an index. Your portfolio can answer it about you specifically.

Two return figures do the work. Time-weighted return (TWR) strips out the effect of your deposits and withdrawals and measures how the holdings themselves performed. Money-weighted return (MWR) accounts for the size and timing of every movement of cash, so it measures how you did.

The gap between them is your timing, as a number:

  • MWR above TWR. Your cash moved in ahead of the good stretches. Timing added value.
  • MWR below TWR. Money arrived before weak stretches, or sat in cash through strong ones. Timing cost you.

If the holdings returned 8% for the year and your own return was 5%, those three points are what your exits and re-entries did to you. Our article on money-weighted vs time-weighted return works through the mechanics.

This is more useful than any general argument, because it is about your actual decisions rather than a hypothetical investor who missed exactly ten days.

How Turbobulls Shows This

Turbobulls computes ROI, money-weighted return (MWR/IRR) and time-weighted return (TWR) from your transaction history, which is what makes the gap above readable rather than theoretical.

Worth being precise about plans here: TWR is one of the four advanced-analytics metrics available on the free plan, alongside wealth velocity, growth rate (CAGR) and portfolio share of net worth. MWR is part of the paid analytics, so the side-by-side comparison this article describes is a paid-plan view rather than something on show by default.

Configurable benchmarks let you set your portfolio against the market over the same period, which is the other half of the question: whether the holdings themselves kept up, separately from what your timing did. The free plan allows one benchmark. Maximum drawdown, useful for understanding how large a fall you actually sat through, is withheld on the free plan.

See What Your Exits Actually Cost

Money-weighted and time-weighted returns side by side, so the effect of your own timing is a number rather than a suspicion.
View Your Dashboard

The Full Picture: Read These Next

Quick Links

DCA vs lump sum - the other timing question, about deploying cash you hold

MWR vs TWR - the two figures whose gap measures your timing

Maximum drawdown - the size of fall you have actually sat through

Return volatility - how jumpy the ride has been

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What if I am certain a crash is coming?

You may well be right about the crash and still lose money, because being right about direction is only half of it. You also have to be right about timing, and about when to return. Plenty of people who correctly predicted a downturn sat in cash through the recovery that followed and ended up behind someone who never formed a view at all.

Q: Is rebalancing market timing?

No, provided the trigger is your allocation rather than your forecast. Rebalancing sells what has grown and buys what has not in order to restore a split you chose in advance, which is close to the opposite of acting on a prediction. If you find yourself skipping a scheduled rebalance because of what you think happens next, that is when it becomes timing.

Q: What about stop losses?

A stop loss automates the exit half and does nothing about the re-entry half, which is the harder one. It converts a temporary fall into a realized loss and leaves you holding cash with no rule for returning. That can be the right tool for a specific trade with a defined thesis; as a general policy for long-term holdings it tends to produce exactly the pattern in the worked example.

Q: I already sold. What now?

Notice that "wait for a better entry point" is the same decision that got expensive in the first place, and that the discomfort of buying back higher than you sold is a sunk cost rather than information. Whatever you decide, deciding it against a plan rather than against the current headline is the part that matters.

Turbobulls is a tracking and analytics tool, not an investment adviser. Nothing here is investment, tax, or legal advice. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Do your own research or consult a licensed professional.

Stop Guessing Whether Your Timing Helped

Turbobulls turns your transaction history into the return figures that answer this for your actual portfolio, not a hypothetical one.

  • Time-weighted return on every plan, including free
  • Money-weighted return alongside it on the paid plan
  • Configurable benchmarks to compare against the market
  • Maximum drawdown on the paid plan for the size of fall you sat through
  • Multi-currency portfolios with FX applied on the trade date
Start Free Trial

Get these by email

One useful investing metric, properly explained. Unsubscribe in one click.

Read more

Dividend Withholding Tax Explained

Dividend Withholding Tax Explained

Why your dividend arrives smaller than announced, which part of the tax you can actually reduce, and which part is buried inside your funds.

Import Interactive Brokers into Turbobulls

Import Interactive Brokers into Turbobulls

Export a Flex Query or Activity Statement from Interactive Brokers and import it in a couple of minutes. What gets brought across, and what does not.

Import XTB into Turbobulls

Import XTB into Turbobulls

Export your XTB account history from xStation and import the workbook directly. What comes across, the ZIP and re-save quirks, and what gets skipped.